Blog
 » 

Comparison

 » 
Web Apps vs Native Apps: Key Differences Explained

Web Apps vs Native Apps: Key Differences Explained

36 min

 read

Compare web apps and native apps to understand their key differences, pros, cons, performance, costs, and which option fits your project best

Jesus Vargas

By 

Jesus Vargas

Updated on

Jul 10, 2025

.

Reviewed by 

Why Trust Our Content

Web Apps vs Native Apps | Key Differences Explained

When starting a new app project, one of the first choices you’ll face is this: should you build a web app or a native app? Both can offer great user experiences, but they work in different ways. The right choice depends on your goals, your users, and how you plan to build it.

If you’re using no-code tools, this decision is even more important. Some platforms are better for web apps, while others focus on native apps. To make the right call, you need to understand what each type offers and how they’re built.

Let’s break it down in simple terms.

What Are Web Apps?

Web apps are apps that run in a web browser like Chrome, Safari, or Firefox. You don’t need to download them. You just visit a URL, log in, and use the app. 

Web apps are built using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. No-code platforms like Bubble or Glide are great for building web apps fast without coding.

Some common examples include:

  • Online shopping sites

  • Booking apps

  • Dashboards for teams

  • Web-based games

Web apps can work on any device with internet access, and they are easier to update. But they may not work offline or access phone hardware as deeply as native apps.

Read more | Best No-code Web App Builders

What Are Native Apps?

Native apps are apps that you download from app stores like Google Play or the Apple App Store. They are built to run on a specific device type, such as Android or iOS. 

These apps are usually made using tools like Swift for iOS or Kotlin for Android. But with no-code tools like FlutterFlow or Bubble, you can build native apps without writing any code.

Native apps can:

  • Work offline

  • Use phone hardware like GPS, camera, or Bluetooth

  • Offer smoother animations and faster performance

But they also have some downsides. They usually take more time to build, and you must submit them to app stores for approval. Also, updating a native app often needs user permission or a new app store review.

Read more | Best No-code Mobile App Builders

Partner with LowCode Agency to Build Web and Native Apps

At LowCode Agency, we specialize in transforming your ideas into fully functional applications using no-code and low-code platforms. Our expert team has built over 330 apps across various industries, helping entrepreneurs and businesses bring their visions to life quickly and cost-effectively.

We use leading no-code platforms to build both web and native mobile apps quickly and efficiently. Our streamlined process usually delivers MVPs in 4–8 weeks, helping you test your idea and start seeing results fast.

We use leading no-code platforms to build both web and native mobile apps, including

  • Bubble – for building powerful web apps and native mobile apps

  • FlutterFlow – for creating native mobile apps for Android and iOS

  • Glide – for building web apps and Progressive Web Apps (PWAs)

  • Webflow – for designing high-quality, responsive websites

Core Differences Between Web Apps and Native Apps

Understanding the fundamental differences between web apps and native apps will help you make an informed decision for your project. Each approach has distinct characteristics that affect everything from development time to user satisfaction.

Let's explore the key areas where these approaches differ significantly.

Key Differences Explained

  • Platform Compatibility: Web apps work on any device with a browser, while native apps are built specifically for iOS or Android. This means one web app serves all users, but you'll need separate native apps for each platform you want to support.
  • Installation Requirements: Users access web apps instantly through URLs without downloading anything. Native apps require installation from app stores, which creates an extra step but also enables offline functionality and deeper system integration.
  • Development Approach: No-code platforms like Bubble and Glide let you build web apps that work everywhere with a single codebase. For native apps, platforms like FlutterFlow generate separate iOS and Android versions from one design, though each still needs platform-specific testing and optimization.
  • System Access: Web apps have limited access to device features like cameras, GPS, and contacts due to browser security restrictions. Native apps can fully utilize your device's hardware and system features, enabling richer functionality and better integration with other apps.
  • Update Process: Web app updates happen instantly when you refresh the page or visit the site. Native app updates require approval from app stores and user action to download, though this also means more control over version management and rollback capabilities.

Read more | Native Mobile App Development

Performance Comparison: Speed and Responsiveness

Native apps usually deliver faster and smoother performance because they are built specifically for one platform like Android or iOS. This allows them to use the device’s full power and hardware features more directly. 

Web apps, on the other hand, rely on internet speed and browser support, which can sometimes make them slower—especially for large or complex apps. 

However, no-code platforms now offer better performance for web apps too, especially when using Progressive Web Apps (PWAs).

Native app performance strengths:

  • Faster screen loading and transitions

  • Better support for animations and gestures

  • Direct access to device features like GPS or camera

  • Works well even with no internet connection

Web app performance notes:

  • Depends on browser speed and internet connection

  • Can lag on slow networks or older devices

  • PWAs improve speed and allow offline access

  • Suitable for most business or data-focused apps

User Experience and UI Quality Differences

Native apps generally provide a smoother and more responsive experience. They follow platform-specific design rules, which makes the interface feel natural for users. Native apps also support mobile gestures, animations, and device settings better. 

In contrast, web apps offer a more unified look across platforms and are easier to build and maintain using no-code tools.

Why native apps often feel better to use:

  • Follow iOS or Android UI design guidelines

  • Support swipe gestures, animations, and touch feedback

  • Feel faster and more connected to the device

  • Offer a full-screen, distraction-free experience

How web apps handle user experience:

  • Same design across browsers and devices

  • Easier to maintain a clean, simple UI

  • Good for dashboards, forms, or simple tools

  • Limited support for complex mobile gestures

Choosing the right type depends on your app goals. If you need a sleek, mobile-first feel with advanced interactions, go native. If your focus is quick access, wide reach, and easier updates, a web app may be the better fit.

Read more | Cross-Platform Mobile App Development Guide

Compatibility and Accessibility

Let’s now explore how web apps and native apps perform across devices, platforms, and network conditions.

Accessibility Across Devices and Platforms

Web apps are built to work across all devices with a web browser. Whether someone is using a laptop, tablet, or smartphone, they can access the app by simply opening a link. 

This makes web apps very flexible and easy to share. You don’t need to worry about platform-specific versions. One app works for everyone.

Native apps, however, are platform-specific. If you want to reach both Android and iOS users, you’ll need to build and maintain two versions of the app. Some no-code tools like FlutterFlow help by letting you build for both platforms from a single project. But you still need to go through app store rules and testing.

In short:

  • Web apps offer wider access with a single build

  • Native apps may offer a better experience but need separate versions

  • Web apps are great for fast sharing, while native apps fit better for platform-specific needs

Offline Capabilities and Data Storage Options

Native apps have a clear advantage when it comes to offline use. Because they are installed on the device, they can store data locally and keep working even when there’s no internet. This makes them a good fit for apps like note-takers, maps, or tools that need real-time access without Wi-Fi.

Web apps usually require an internet connection to function. However, Progressive Web Apps (PWAs), built with tools like Glide, now offer offline capabilities too. They allow users to load the app, save limited data, and even use the app while offline, though not as fully as native apps.

Key differences in offline and storage support:

  • Native apps store data directly on the device

  • Native apps can sync data later when internet returns

  • PWAs offer some offline features, but not always full access

  • Standard web apps may stop working without internet

Choosing the right option depends on how critical offline access is for your app’s purpose.

Internet Connectivity Requirements

Web apps generally need an internet connection to work. They load content through the browser and often connect to online databases in real time. This works well when users are always online, like in offices or at home. But it can be a problem in areas with poor connectivity.

Native apps, on the other hand, can store key parts of the app and its data on the user’s phone. This means users can still open and use the app even without internet. For example, a native note-taking or fitness app can save your input offline and sync it later.

What to know about internet needs:

  • Web apps rely on constant connection for full use

  • Native apps work better in low or no internet zones

  • PWAs add offline support to web apps but with limits

  • If offline use is important, native apps are more reliable

When building with no-code, think about your users’ environment—are they always online, or do they need access anywhere, anytime?

Read more | Glide Mobile App

Device Integration and Features

Now let’s look at how each app type connects with the device’s hardware and built-in features.

Access to Hardware: Camera, GPS, and Sensors

Native apps have strong access to a phone’s hardware. This includes the camera, GPS, microphone, Bluetooth, and other sensors. Because native apps are built specifically for the device’s operating system, they can use these features smoothly and with fewer restrictions. This is why apps like maps, ride-sharing, or health trackers are usually built as native apps.

Web apps have limited access to hardware. In most browsers, you can use the camera or location services with permission, but it’s not as fast or reliable. Web apps also can’t access features like background Bluetooth or some motion sensors.

Key points:

  • Native apps fully access hardware features

  • Web apps offer limited access through the browser

  • Native apps work better for real-time features like GPS tracking or photo capture

  • No-code platforms like FlutterFlow make it easy to use these native features

If your app needs deep hardware control, native is the way to go.

Installation Process and App Size Differences

The way users install web and native apps is very different. Web apps don’t require any installation. You just visit the URL and start using it. This makes them light and easy to access. Some platforms like Glide even let users “add to home screen,” giving the app a native-like feel without downloading anything from an app store.

Native apps must be downloaded from app stores. This adds a few extra steps, like searching the store, downloading, and waiting for installation. Native apps also tend to be larger in file size because they include extra code for offline features, animations, and platform support.

Things to consider:

  • Web apps are easier and faster to access

  • Native apps require download and installation

  • Native apps may take more space on the device

  • PWAs offer a good balance—web apps with install-like experience

So, if your goal is quick access and lightweight use, web apps may be a better choice.

Push Notification Support

Push notifications are a powerful way to keep users engaged. Native apps have strong support for push notifications. You can send alerts directly to a user’s phone, even when the app is not open. This helps with updates, reminders, or promotions and is great for apps that need regular interaction.

Web apps traditionally did not support push notifications, but that has changed with the rise of Progressive Web Apps (PWAs). PWAs can now send push notifications on Android and some desktop browsers, but support is still limited on iOS. Native apps remain the most reliable option for full notification features.

Summary of push notification access:

  • Native apps offer full, reliable push notification support

  • PWAs allow push notifications, but with platform limits

  • Standard web apps don’t support notifications

  • FlutterFlow makes adding push features easier in native apps

If staying in touch with users is key, native apps give you more control and reach.

Read more | Mobile App MVP Development Guide

Development and Deployment

The way you build and launch your app plays a big role in cost, speed, and long-term updates.

Let’s look at how web apps and native apps differ during development and deployment.

Development Cost Comparison

Web apps are usually more affordable to build. You only need to create one version, and it works across all devices. Many no-code platforms like Bubble and Glide make this even easier by offering templates and built-in tools.

Native apps often cost more. You may need to hire two developers or teams—one for iOS and one for Android. While tools like FlutterFlow let you create both versions in one project, the testing and store requirements still add to the cost.

Key cost differences:

  • Web apps need one version for all platforms

  • Native apps often need two separate builds

  • No-code tools reduce cost but native is still higher

  • Web apps are more budget-friendly for startups and MVPs

If you’re starting with a small budget, web apps are the more cost-effective choice.

Time to Market Differences

Web apps can be launched quickly. Once the app is ready, you can share the URL and users can start using it right away. There is no approval process or waiting time. This makes web apps ideal for testing early versions and getting user feedback fast.

Native apps take longer to launch. After development, you must submit the app to the Google Play or Apple App Store. These stores review the app, which may take a few days. If changes are needed, it can delay your launch.

Time comparison:

  • Web apps launch as soon as development is finished

  • Native apps need review before they go live

  • Web apps are faster for testing and updates

  • Native apps may delay marketing or release schedules

If speed is important for your business, web apps help you move faster.

Maintenance and Update Processes

Keeping your app up to date is easier with web apps. When you make a change, it goes live for everyone right away. Users always see the latest version without needing to download anything. This makes bug fixes and new features simple to manage.

Native apps need more work to update. You have to submit each update to the app stores, wait for approval, and hope users download the new version. Some users may keep using an older version, which can cause problems with performance or features.

Maintenance insights:

  • Web apps update instantly for all users

  • Native apps need approval and user action to update

  • Web apps are easier for quick fixes and changes

  • Native apps give more control but take longer to update

For teams that need flexibility and fast changes, web apps are easier to maintain over time.

Read more | Bubble MVP App Development

Platform and Security Considerations

Understanding platform limits and security challenges is important when deciding between a web app and a native app.

Platform Dependence and App Store Distribution

Web apps are platform-independent. You build one version, and it works on any device with a browser, including Windows, Mac, Android, or iOS. This gives you a wide reach without needing to change your app for each device. You can also skip app store rules and launch directly by sharing a link.

Native apps are platform-dependent. You must follow the rules of each app store, like Apple’s App Store or Google Play. You also need to build separate versions for each system, or use tools like FlutterFlow to handle both. App store approval can slow things down, but it also adds some credibility.

What to remember:

  • Web apps run on all devices through browsers

  • Native apps are built for iOS or Android specifically

  • Web apps don’t need app store approval

  • Native apps must follow store rules and review steps

Choosing the right approach depends on your audience and how you plan to distribute the app.

Read more | Mobile App Development Guide

Security Considerations for Web vs Native Apps

Security matters in every app, but how you protect it depends on the type. Web apps are always exposed to the internet, which means they face more common threats like data leaks, phishing, or browser-based attacks. You must secure both the server and the app itself. Using HTTPS, user authentication, and proper data storage are essential.

Native apps are less exposed because much of the code runs on the device. But they’re not risk-free. If the app stores sensitive data or connects to a server, it must be protected from hacking or unauthorized access. You also need to secure APIs and follow the platform rules for data use.

Security basics to consider:

  • Web apps need strong server-side security and encryption

  • Native apps require secure data storage on devices

  • Web apps are more open to browser attacks

  • Native apps are safer locally but still need secure network handling

No matter which path you choose, using trusted no-code tools with built-in security features can help reduce risks.

Read more | No-code Mobile App Development Guide

Business Aspects: Monetization and User Engagement

Now let’s look at how web and native apps affect your ability to earn money, keep users engaged, and push updates quickly.

Monetization Options Differences

Native apps have more built-in ways to earn money. You can charge for app downloads, offer in-app purchases, and use subscriptions through Google Play or the App Store. These stores also allow ad integration and paid upgrades. However, they take a percentage of your earnings, usually around 15 to 30 percent.

Web apps give you full control over pricing and payments. You can sell subscriptions, memberships, or products directly without sharing a cut with any app store. But you must handle payments securely, usually through services like Stripe or PayPal. Web apps don’t support in-app purchases through app stores, which may limit exposure.

Key monetization points:

  • Native apps offer in-app purchases and subscriptions

  • App stores take a portion of your earnings

  • Web apps allow direct payment with no fees to stores

  • You have more pricing freedom on the web

The best option depends on your business model and how you plan to collect payments.

Read more | eCommerce Mobile App Development Guide

User Engagement and Retention Statistics

User engagement tends to be higher in native apps. These apps support push notifications, smoother animations, and better integration with the device, which helps keep users coming back. Native apps also stay on the user’s home screen, making them more visible and easier to re-open.

Web apps often rely on email or SMS reminders to re-engage users. While effective, these methods may not work as well as native push notifications. Web apps can still provide good user experiences, especially when optimized for mobile use.

What the numbers say:

  • Native apps see higher engagement and daily usage

  • Push notifications help drive user return rates

  • Web apps have lower retention unless supported by strong email or SMS strategies

  • Native apps benefit from being installed and easy to access

If your goal is long-term user retention, native apps often perform better due to better re-engagement tools.

Read more | How to Hire Web App Developers

Pros and Cons

To help you decide between web and native apps, it’s important to weigh their strengths and weaknesses side by side.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Web Apps

Web apps are popular for startups and small businesses because they are quick to build and easy to maintain. You only need one version, and it works on any device with a browser. Web apps also skip the app store process, so you can launch and update faster.

However, web apps can’t use all device features. They may have slower performance compared to native apps and limited offline support. Push notifications are also restricted, especially on iOS.

Pros of web apps:

  • One version for all platforms

  • Faster and easier to launch

  • Lower development and maintenance cost

  • Simple updates without user action

Cons of web apps:

  • Limited access to device hardware

  • May not work well offline

  • Weaker push notification support

  • Slightly lower performance on mobile

Web apps are best when speed, budget, and broad access matter most.

Read more | Best No-code Website Builders

Advantages and Disadvantages of Native Apps

Native apps give a smooth, high-quality user experience. They are faster, more responsive, and can use all hardware features like camera, GPS, and Bluetooth. Native apps also support strong user engagement through push notifications and app store presence.

But native apps are more expensive to build and maintain. You often need two separate versions—one for iOS and one for Android. Updates take longer due to app store reviews, and not all users install them right away.

Pros of native apps:

  • Full access to device features

  • Better speed and performance

  • Strong push notification support

  • Higher user engagement and retention

Cons of native apps:

  • Higher cost for development and updates

  • Slower time to market due to store approval

  • Requires ongoing app store management

  • Harder to update across all users instantly

Native apps are ideal when performance, user experience, and hardware access are top priorities.

Read more | Rapid Web App Development

Real-World Use Cases: When to Pick a Web App

Web apps are a strong choice in many real-life situations. Let’s look at when they make the most sense for your project.

Benefits of Web Apps for Startups and Small Projects

For startups, speed and budget are everything. Web apps let you build a working product without spending too much time or money. You can launch faster, test your idea with users, and make changes quickly—all without app store delays or approval steps.

Why startups love web apps:

  • Quick to launch and easy to update

  • Lower development costs and fewer tech barriers

  • Great for MVPs and validating ideas early

  • Easy to share and access through simple links

If your goal is to test fast, save money, and learn from users, web apps are the perfect first step.

Web Apps for Cross-Device Reach and Easy Access

Web apps work on any device with a browser. You don’t have to build one version for iOS and another for Android. Whether your user is on a phone, tablet, or desktop, the same app works for everyone—no downloads needed.

Best use cases for cross-device apps:

  • Admin panels and dashboards

  • Booking systems or form-heavy tools

  • Educational platforms that run in classrooms or at home

  • Customer portals for desktop and mobile

With web apps, your product becomes instantly available to more people without the hassle of installation.

Limitations to Consider with Web Apps

Web apps are flexible and affordable, but they aren’t perfect. They may feel slower than native apps on mobile, especially for animations or heavy tasks. They also don’t always work well offline or connect deeply with device hardware.

Key limits to be aware of:

  • No access to advanced device features like Bluetooth or fingerprint sensor

  • Push notifications may not work on all platforms

  • Poor performance in low internet conditions

  • Can’t match the polish of some native experiences

If your app depends on deep mobile features or offline use, a web app may fall short. But for most business tools or MVPs, these trade-offs are often worth it.

Real-World Use Cases: When to Pick a Native App

Native apps are a strong fit when your project demands performance, deep device access, and long-term user engagement.

Why Native Apps Excel in Performance and User Engagement

Native apps are built to run directly on a specific operating system. This means they load faster, offer smoother animations, and respond more quickly to touch or gesture inputs. For apps where user experience is key, this performance difference matters a lot.

They also support powerful engagement tools like push notifications, app badges, and home screen presence. These features keep users involved and help drive regular use.

Use cases where native shines:

  • Social media platforms and chat apps

  • Fitness or wellness trackers

  • Music or video streaming apps

  • E-commerce apps with high user activity

When speed and user interaction are core to your app’s success, native is often the better choice.

Ideal Scenarios for Native Apps with Hardware Integration

Some apps rely heavily on hardware features like the camera, GPS, or sensors. Native apps are better suited for this because they have full access to the device’s functions. They also support background tasks and offline features more effectively than web apps.

If your app needs to capture photos, scan barcodes, track movement, or work in real time, a native build offers more control and reliability.

Best fits for hardware-heavy apps:

  • Navigation and location tracking tools

  • Augmented reality (AR) experiences

  • Health monitoring apps with sensors

  • Secure apps that need fingerprint or face recognition

When hardware is part of the core user experience, native apps provide a smoother and more dependable solution.

Challenges to Expect with Native App Development

While native apps are powerful, they also come with challenges. You may need to build and maintain two separate versions—one for Android and one for iOS. This increases development time, testing work, and long-term costs.

App store approval can also slow things down. Each update must be reviewed, and rollout delays may affect your users. Plus, updates depend on users downloading them, so not everyone gets the latest version right away.

Common challenges with native apps:

  • Higher cost and longer build time

  • App store approval delays

  • Managing two versions with separate updates

  • More effort needed for testing and maintenance

If your team has the time, budget, and technical support, these trade-offs can be managed. But it’s important to plan ahead.

Real-World Case Studies of Web & Native Apps

1. RedZone

Take RedZone, a FlutterFlow-built native app we created for sewer inspection teams. The challenge was building an app that works offline underground where there's no connectivity. Our solution reduced work order processing time by 40% and increased data accuracy by 80%, serving 150 active users who can now focus on their actual tasks instead of paperwork.

2. Attributes

The Attributes showcases our expertise in building scalable web platforms. This Bubble-powered leadership assessment platform transformed from a simple tool into an enterprise-ready system serving Fortune 500 companies. The platform achieved complete ROI within six months and now handles over 1,300 users simultaneously, proving how web apps can scale effectively for business growth.

3. Copious Land

Copious.Land demonstrates our expertise in building specialized marketplaces. This Bubble-based land investment platform features location-based search and satellite integration, increasing successful property transactions by 40% and member engagement by 30%.

4. BuildGenius

BuildGenius represents our AI-enhanced capabilities, combining Glide's data management with intelligent document processing for real estate development. This solution reduced document retrieval time by 45% and increased project management capacity by 70%, showing how modern web apps can integrate cutting-edge AI functionality.

Modern Approaches and Future Trends

As technology improves, the line between web and native apps is getting thinner. New tools and methods make it easier to build flexible, high-quality apps without writing code.

Cross-Platform Solutions: Hybrid Apps and PWAs

Hybrid apps combine web and native features in one build. Tools like FlutterFlow let you design once and launch on both Android and iOS. This saves time and cost without losing too much performance. Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are also growing. They act like native apps but run in a browser and can be installed on a home screen.

These options work well for many businesses that want mobile reach without building from scratch twice.

App Performance on Different Devices and OS Versions

Native apps generally perform best on the latest versions of Android or iOS. But they may have issues on older devices. Web apps are more stable across devices since they run in browsers, but can still lag on outdated systems or slow internet.

Choosing the right approach depends on your target audience’s devices and tech habits.

Market Trends and Future Outlook for Web and Native Apps

The mobile app market continues to grow, but user expectations are higher than ever. Native apps will stay strong for apps that need speed, rich design, or full hardware use. At the same time, web apps and PWAs are becoming more popular because they are cheaper, faster to build, and easier to update.

Many businesses now use both: a native app for top users and a web app for broad reach. No-code tools will make this even easier in the future.

Ready to turn your app idea into reality?

Whether you need a web app for cross-platform reach or a native app for advanced functionality, our team at LowCode Agency can help you choose the right approach and build a solution that grows with your business. 

Book a free discovery call with us today and discover how we can bring your vision to life in weeks, not months.

Created on 

July 9, 2025

. Last updated on 

July 10, 2025

.

Jesus Vargas

Jesus Vargas

 - 

Founder

Jesus is a visionary entrepreneur and tech expert. After nearly a decade working in web development, he founded LowCode Agency to help businesses optimize their operations through custom software solutions. 

Ready to start your project?
Book your free discovery call and learn more about how we can help streamline your development process.
Book now
Free discovery call
Share

FAQs

What is the main difference between a web app and a native app?

Which app type offers better performance, web apps or native apps?

Are web apps accessible on all devices and platforms?

How do development costs compare between web apps and native apps?

Can web apps work offline like native apps?

What are the benefits of using hybrid apps or progressive web apps (PWAs)?

Why customers trust us for no-code development

Expertise
We’ve built 330+ amazing projects with no-code.
Process
Our process-oriented approach ensures a stress-free experience.
Support
With a 30+ strong team, we’ll support your business growth.