Blog
 » 
FlutterFlow vs Wappler: A comparison for 2024

FlutterFlow vs Wappler: A comparison for 2024

So, you're itching to build a new app? As you weigh your no-code platform options, FlutterFlow and Wappler present themselves as noteworthy candidates. Join us as we explore the roots, strengths, and weaknesses of FlutterFlow and Wappler, guiding you toward the platform that aligns best with your development goals.

TL;DR

FlutterFlow has a powerful visual editor and pre-built components, ideal for rapid prototyping, business solutions, and MVPs. Firebase integration streamlines backend and deployment, while native-like performance on Android and iOS keeps users hooked. Wappler direct access to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. You'll need to invest more time and have technical expertise.

Key feature comparison

Drag and drop

  • FlutterFlow: Intuitive drag-and-drop interface for building app layouts and adding pre-built widgets. It is beginner-friendly and ideal for rapid prototyping.
  • Wappler: Visual layout builder with more granular control over HTML elements and code. It has a steeper learning curve.

Debugging

  • FlutterFlow: Built-in simulator for both iOS and Android, live reload for instant changes, and a code debugger available in the advanced plan.
  • Wappler: Visual debugger for web apps, Chrome DevTools integration for mobile apps, offering more advanced debugging options. It requires familiarity with web development tools.

Version control

  • FlutterFlow: Git integration is available in all plans, the setup is quite simple, and it also includes version control.
  • Wappler: Built-in project history and rollback feature. Having an external Git integration is possible but requires manual setup.

Native mobile app development

  • FlutterFlow excels in native mobile app development using Flutter, known for high performance and visual fidelity.
  • Wappler primarily focuses on web app development, with hybrid mobile app capabilities that may not match Flutterflow's performance.

Coding flexibility

FlutterFlow:

  • No-code emphasis: Primarily designed for visual development with drag-and-drop and pre-built components.
  • Custom code options:
  • Limited code editing within the interface for basic customization.
  • Code export for further modification in a code editor, but re-importing can be challenging.
  • Integration with third-party services and APIs through plugins and workarounds.

Wappler:

  • Hybrid approach: Blends visual development with the ability to work directly with code.
  • Custom code options:
  • Visual code editor for direct manipulation of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  • Access to the full codebase for complete control and customization.
  • Server-side scripting for custom backend logic and integrations.

Design capabilities

FlutterFlow is beginner-friendly, offering a drag-and-drop interface and pre-built widgets for quick UI assembly. Wappler takes a code-centric approach, allowing precise control through a flexible visual layout builder, but it requires deeper technical knowledge.

Both platforms allow for extensive customization. FlutterFlow provides control over colors, fonts, and animations. Wappler goes a step further, enabling direct access to the codebase for custom UI elements and intricate interactions. Having CSS expertise will allow you to work with highly personalized elements and designs on both platforms.

Deciding which platform is better depends on your project's requirements. FlutterFlow will let you create great UIs and user journeys with its UI kit library and templates in no time, and further customize them as you need. On the other hand, Wappler's code-based canvas is ideal for complex designs but will require more work on the code.

FlutterFlow can be perfect for your project! Explore the possibilities with our development services

Integrations and extensibility

FlutterFlow provides seamless connections with Firebase, offering real-time data, authentication, storage, and cloud functions. Additionally, it integrates effortlessly with popular payment gateways such as Stripe and PayPal, ensuring smooth and secure transactions. The platform also offers a range of plugins for analytics, social media integration, email marketing, and more.

For users seeking additional functionality, FlutterFlow allows the extension of capabilities through custom code snippets and third-party plugins. Furthermore, users can employ REST APIs to establish connections with external services and diverse data sources.

Wappler takes a code-centric approach, utilizing JavaScript libraries and APIs to integrate with various services and tools. You can also use jQuery plugins to create enhanced visual effects and interactions. There’s also a diverse range of third-party extensions and components through the Wappler Store.

Pricing models

Free tiers

FlutterFlow:

  • Suitable for: Beginners, hobbyists, early-stage projects
  • Features: Basic app building, limited customization, 50 builds/month, ads

Wappler:

  • Suitable for: Learning the platform, smaller projects
  • Features: Full functionality, watermark on exported apps

Individual and startup plans:

FlutterFlow Pro ($29/month):

  • Suitable for: Individuals, startups, small businesses
  • Features: Unlimited builds, custom domains, analytics, no ads

Wappler Personal ($22/month):

  • Suitable for: Individual developers, freelancers
  • Features: Full functionality, no watermarks, 3 live apps

Team and agency plans:

FlutterFlow Pro Team ($49/month/user):

  • Suitable for: Teams, agencies, larger projects
  • Features: Unlimited team members, collaboration tools, priority support

Wappler Developer ($42/month):

  • Suitable for: Developers, small teams
  • Features: Full functionality, unlimited live apps, 5 team members

Enterprise plans:

FlutterFlow Enterprise (Custom pricing):

  • Suitable for: Large enterprises with specific needs
  • Features: Custom features, dedicated support, SLAs

Wappler Agency ($54/month):

  • Suitable for: Agencies, unlimited team members
  • Features: Full functionality, unlimited live apps

Community and support

FlutterFlow has a large and active community with beginner-friendly resources, frequent forum discussions, social media engagement, and even meetups. The development team actively shares updates and best practices. Meanwhile, Wrappler has a smaller but focused community of experienced developers and enthusiasts. Discussions that go deep into technical aspects dominate the forum.

FlutterFlow offers extensive documentation and detailed video tutorials. Paid subscribers have access to additional support channels like email. Similar to FlutterFlow, Wrappler also has documentation available and some video tutorials. Paid options unlock priority email and live chat support for more direct assistance.

Cross-platform support

FlutterFlow has excellent cross-platform performance due to its native approach using Flutter. Apps deliver near-native speed and responsiveness across Android, iOS, web, and, more recently, even desktop. The platform will give you access to the most important device features, only some might require custom plugins or workarounds.

FlutterFlow offers hot reload capabilities for rapid UI development, allowing you to preview changes instantly without full rebuilds. Also, with Firebase, you can manage offline data storage and caching, so the app is functional offline.

Wappler’s hybrid approach (Apache Cordova for mobile, HTML/CSS/JS for web) offers flexibility, but performance might slightly lag behind native apps, especially on resource-intensive tasks. Achieving optimal responsiveness with Wappler can demand more effort since it requires manual configuration using conditional logic and CSS media queries.

When it comes to accessing native device features the Cordova plugins can handle most scenarios, though compatibility and performance can vary depending on the plugin quality. Wappler also lacks a built-in hot reload functionality, so you’ll need to make manual rebuilds and deployments to view changes.

Learn more: Can you build a web app with FlutterFlow?

Code export 

FlutterFlow

  • Export format: Flutter code (Dart).
  • Capabilities:
  • Export the entire codebase for further customization and development within a traditional coding environment.
  • Potential for deeper integrations and functionality beyond Flutterflow's built-in features.
  • Limitations:
  • Re-importing edited code back into Flutterflow isn’t possible.

Wappler

  • Export format: HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and server-side code (if applicable).
  • Capabilities:
  • Export fully functional web apps and mobile apps (using Apache Cordova).
  • Allows complete control over the codebase for further development and customization.
  • Host projects on any server or platform without reliance on Wappler.
  • Limitations:
  • Wappler's hybrid approach to mobile app development might have performance differences compared to native apps built directly with Flutter.
  • Wappler's export capabilities are better suited for those comfortable with coding and managing codebases independently.

Deployment and hosting

Let's explore how FlutterFlow and Wappler handle deployment and hosting, the final leap your app takes before landing in users' hands.

FlutterFlow

  • Deployment Options:
  • Cloud-based: Choose from FlutterFlow's own hosting service or integrate with popular cloud platforms like Google Cloud or AWS. This is the simplest way to setup with automatic updates, and scaling based on your needs.
  • Self-hosted: Take complete control by deploying your app to your own server infrastructure. You get flexibility for custom configurations but requires server management expertise.
  • App stores: You can submit your app for both Android and iOS app stores directly from inside the platform.
  • Web: Deployment to web platforms with no additional configuration, with easy access for desktop and mobile web users.

Wappler

  • Deployment options:
  • Manual deployment: Manually build and deploy your app to various platforms, offering ultimate control but requiring technical knowledge of each platform's specific requirements.
  • Third-party services: Integrate with services like Cordova Build or Ionic Pro for simplified deployment to mobile app stores and web platforms.
  • App stores: You’ll have to manually take care of the app store submission process for each platform (Android and iOS). This requires familiarity with the store's guidelines and submission procedures.
  • Web: Requires manual configuration and hosting arrangements for web deployment, adding extra steps to the launch process.

Key differences:

FlutterFlow's cloud-based and app store integrations offer a quicker and simpler deployment experience, particularly for beginners. Wappler's manual approach grants complete control over hosting. The advantage here is the level of customization you get, but you can achieve the same with Flutterflow if you decide to self-host.

Backend

FlutterFlow is primarily integrated with Firebase, making it the core focus for backend functionalities. While you can connect to external backends using REST APIs or Firebase extensions, Firebase remains the most used backend solution. The platform offers a visual interface for interacting with Firebase services (database, authentication, storage, and functions), so you don't need to rely on extensive coding to manage most features.

While Wappler offers visual tools for frontend development, backend development involves writing code for server-side scripts and handling database interactions. Since you have to manually build your backend you can choose any technology stack, including Node.js, PHP, Python, etc.

Security and privacy

FlutterFlow's security and privacy features are primarily tied to Firebase's capabilities. This integration not only ensures a high level of protection but also simplifies the implementation process, contributing to the platform's user-friendly and straightforward approach. 

For secure communication between the app and servers, both platforms support HTTPS. However, FlutterFlow enforces it, while in Wappler, manual configuration is necessary.

FlutterFlow provides basic built-in validation for form inputs, but advanced validation requires code modifications. In contrast, Wappler requires developers to implement custom validation logic for each input field, offering full customization but with increased complexity.

Learn more: A Review of FlutterFlow Security and Best Practices

Pros and cons

FlutterFlow pros:

  • Fast development: Visual interface and pre-built components accelerate development, ideal for rapid prototyping.
  • Native-like performance: Cross-platform development with near-native performance on Android, iOS, web, and even desktop.
  • Firebase integration: Streamlined access to Firebase's built-in security, authentication, and data management tools.
  • Cloud-based deployment: Simplified deployment and scaling options with Flutterflow's own hosting service or popular cloud platforms.
  • Lower learning curve: Friendly interface and visual tools make it easier to learn compared to code-centric platforms.
  • Flexibility and customization: Adapt and extend your app to any desired functionality through custom code and external integrations.

FlutterFlow cons:

  • Limited offline support: Requires additional development effort for optimal offline functionality.
  • Pricing considerations: Cloud hosting adds recurring costs and advanced features might require paid plans.

Wappler pros:

  • Complete control: Code-based approach offers control over every aspect of your app's functionality and design.
  • Server-side scripting: Build dynamic UIs and logic on the server side for complex app behavior.
  • Ownership: Full ownership and control over your codebase and deployment process.

Wappler cons:

  • Steeper learning curve: Requires coding knowledge and understanding of web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  • Slower development time: Manual coding demands more time and effort compared to visual development platforms.
  • Self-hosted management: Requires expertise in server management and infrastructure setup for deployment.
  • Security and privacy responsibility: Developers shoulder the burden of implementing robust security and privacy measures.

Learn more: Evaluating FlutterFlow: Key advantages and limitations

Conclusion

Choose FlutterFlow if:

  • You prioritize speed and ease of development.
  • You value native-like performance and Firebase integration.
  • You prefer a visual development approach.

Choose Wappler if:

  • You need complete control over your app's functionality and design.
  • You require advanced customizations and integrations beyond built-in options.
  • You have coding expertise and prefer a code-based approach.

In the end, it comes down to what is most important to you. Wappler's strength lies in its coding capabilities, but it will demand more development time and expertise compared to FlutterFlow's visual development approach. Meanwhile, FlutterFlow shines in several key aspects. Leveraging natively compiled code through Flutter, it delivers exceptional performance on both Android and iOS, surpassing the limitations of hybrid apps. That’s why Flutterflow is our top pick for mobile development!

Ready to start a conversation? We're here to answer your questions and discuss your project needs. Book a free consultation and get a detailed quote!

FAQs