Minimum Viable Product vs Minimum Business Increment

‍
What Is a Minimum Viable Product (MVP)?

A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is the simplest version of your product that delivers core value to users while requiring minimal resources to build. It's not a rough prototype or a half-finished product; it's a strategically simplified version that focuses on solving your users' most essential problems.

‍

‍

The primary purpose of an MVP is to validate your business assumptions quickly and efficiently. Rather than investing months or years developing a product based on untested hypotheses, an MVP lets you gather real user feedback with significantly less risk and investment.

Key characteristics of a successful MVP include:

• Core functionality only: It includes just enough features to solve the main problem for your target users
• Quick to market: Designed to be developed and launched rapidly
• Data-focused: Built specifically to test hypotheses and gather meaningful user feedback
• Iterative: Serves as the foundation for future improvements based on validated learning
• Resource-efficient: Minimizes time, money, and effort while maximizing learning

MVPs play a crucial role in reducing both financial and market risks. Instead of guessing what features users might want, you gather actual data to guide your decisions and refine your product based on real-world usage.

‍

What Is a Minimum Business Increment (MBI)?

A Minimum Business Increment (MBI) is a small, complete piece of functionality that delivers measurable business value to users and stakeholders. Unlike an MVP, which focuses on testing assumptions, an MBI is designed to address a specific business need and produce immediate, tangible outcomes.

The primary purpose of an MBI is to create business value with each release. These increments are small enough to be delivered quickly but complete enough to provide real benefits. MBIs prioritize generating revenue, improving user satisfaction, or achieving other defined business metrics rather than primarily gathering feedback.

MBIs fit seamlessly into agile product development frameworks by:

• Breaking down large initiatives into manageable, value-generating chunks
• Creating a steady cadence of business value delivery throughout development
• Allowing teams to respond to changing priorities without sacrificing completed work
• Providing stakeholders with regular, measurable returns on their investment
• Enabling continuous improvement while maintaining focus on business outcomes

In agile environments, MBIs help teams avoid the "90% done syndrome," where projects appear nearly complete but struggle to deliver actual value. Instead, they emphasize shipping complete, functional increments that users can benefit from immediately.

‍

MVP vs MBI: Key Differences You Should Know

When planning your product development strategy, understanding the distinction between MVPs and MBIs can help you choose the right approach for your specific goals. While they may seem similar, they serve fundamentally different purposes in your product journey.

Focus: Learning vs Delivering Value

An MVP prioritizes learning and validation above all else. Its primary goal is to test critical assumptions about your product and market with minimal investment. The focus remains on gathering data to inform future development decisions.

An MBI, by contrast, centers on delivering concrete business value with each release. While learning still occurs, the primary objective is to create functionality that directly contributes to business goals such as revenue generation, user acquisition, or operational efficiency.

Outcome: Feedback vs Revenue

The success of an MVP is measured by the quality and quantity of feedback it generates. Did you validate your assumptions? Did you learn something that changes your approach? These learnings are the primary outcome, even if the product itself isn't immediately profitable.

MBIs are judged by their impact on business metrics. Each increment should significantly improve key performance indicators such as conversion rates, customer retention, or average order value. The outcome is measurable improvement in business performance.

Scope of Delivery and Feature Readiness

An MVP often includes features that are functional but not necessarily polished. The emphasis is on implementing just enough functionality to test core hypotheses. Features might be simplified versions of what's planned for the final product.

MBIs deliver complete, production-ready features that provide immediate value to users. While limited in scope, each increment must be fully functional, reliable, and ready for real-world use without significant limitations or compromises.

Internal Testing vs External Stakeholder Value

MVPs are frequently used as internal testing tools, gathering data from a limited audience to inform product direction. They may not be suitable for widespread release or they may target early adopters who understand the experimental nature.

MBIs are designed to create value for external stakeholders from day one. Each increment should be robust enough to satisfy customers, partners, or other stakeholders while contributing to the company's business objectives.

‍

Development Approach: MVP vs MBI

The way you approach development differs significantly between MVPs and MBIs, though both support an iterative product development process. Understanding these differences can help you structure your development cycles more effectively.

MVP as a Test Version

An MVP is primarily a learning tool that may or may not reach the broader market. The development approach focuses on speed and simplicity, prioritizing the fastest path to testing key assumptions.

You'll typically build just enough functionality to validate your core hypothesis about user needs or market opportunities. This might mean creating a simplified interface, using placeholder content, or implementing manual processes behind automated features.

When developing MVPs, it's common to accept imperfections and restricted features, as your primary objective is to learn, not to achieve perfection. Some MVPs might be discarded entirely if they disprove your assumptions, while others evolve into full products.

MBI as a Real, Deployable Increment

An MBI is developed as a production-ready piece of functionality that will definitely reach users. The development approach emphasizes completeness and quality within a limited scope.

When building an MBI, you're creating something that will generate immediate business value once deployed. This requires thorough testing, proper documentation, and consideration of how it integrates with existing systems. Each increment must meet quality standards for release.

Unlike MVPs, MBIs are not experimental in nature; they're carefully planned components of your product strategy, designed to deliver specific business outcomes.

How Both Support Iterative Development

Despite their differences, both MVPs and MBIs support iterative development practices. They create valuable feedback loops that allow you to gather insights and incorporate them into future development cycles. This continuous learning process helps teams adapt to changing requirements and user needs.

Both approaches reduce risk by breaking down development into smaller, manageable pieces rather than attempting to build everything at once. This allows you the flexibility to adjust course based on new information instead of committing to a rigid long-term plan that might not serve your business goals.

MVPs and MBIs both provide clear milestones to measure progress against business and product objectives. The key difference is that MVPs orient these iterations around learning and validation, while MBIs focus iterations on delivering incremental business value. Many successful products use both approaches at different stages of their lifecycle.

‍

Value Delivery and Investment Comparison

Choosing between an MVP and MBI approach requires understanding the investment required and value delivered by each strategy. This comparison can help you determine which approach aligns best with your current business priorities and resources.

Cost and Effort in Building MVP

Building an MVP typically requires less initial investment than developing a fully-featured product. You'll focus resources on creating just enough functionality to test your core assumptions, which can significantly reduce development time and costs.

For startups and new ventures, this lower upfront investment is particularly valuable. Instead of spending months or years building a comprehensive solution based on untested assumptions, you can validate your concept with real users in a matter of weeks.

The lean approach of MVP development allows you to allocate resources more efficiently. Instead of refining features that may not appeal to users, you can focus on what your target audience values. This optimization often results in savings of 30–50% compared to traditional product development approaches.

Business Value Delivered Through MBI

MBIs deliver tangible business value from day one. Each increment directly contributes to key performance indicators such as revenue generation, user acquisition, or operational efficiency improvements.

The focused nature of MBIs ensures that every development sprint produces functionality that users can immedately benefit from. This creates a steady stream of value throughout the development process rather than deferring returns until a complete product is ready.

For established businesses, MBIs provide a way to show stakeholders regular progress and returns on investment. Each increment serves as proof that the development effort is yielding results, which can help secure continued support and funding for longer-term initiatives.

How to Prioritize Based on Business Goals

Your current business objectives should guide your choice between MVP and MBI approaches. If you're entering a new market or testing an unproven concept, an MVP likely makes more sense. The primary goal is to validate assumptions before making larger investments.

When you've already validated your core product concept but need to deliver ongoing improvements, the MBI approach often proves more effective. This allows you to continuously enhance your offering while maintaining focus on business outcomes.

Many successful businesses combine both approaches at different stages of product development. You might start with an MVP to validate the concept, then transition to an MBI approach for ongoing development once you've confirmed product-market fit.

Consider your available resources, timeline constraints, and risk tolerance when making this decision. An MVP might be preferable when resources are limited or when entering highly uncertain markets. MBIs tend to work better when you have established processes, stable resource allocation, and clear business metrics to track.

‍

Feedback and Risk Management

The approaches to gathering feedback and managing risk differ significantly between MVPs and MBIs. Understanding these differences can help you implement the right strategy for your product development process.

How MVP Gathers Learning and Insight

An MVP creates a direct channel for learning from real users interacting with your product. By putting a simplified version of your solution in users' hands, you gather unfiltered feedback about what works and what doesn't.

This approach allows you to test your most critical assumptions before investing heavily in development. You might discover that features you thought were essential actually don't matter to users, or that an entirely different aspect of your product provides unexpected value.

The feedback from an MVP is particularly valuable because it comes from actual usage rather than hypothetical discussions. Users often can't articulate what they want until they interact with something tangible. An MVP provides this tangible experience while limiting your investment and exposure.

How MBI Builds on Feedback with Measurable Value

MBIs take a more structured approach to feedback by focusing on measurable business outcomes. Each increment creates value that can be quantified through metrics like conversion rates, user engagement, or revenue generation.

This approach builds on previous learning by implementing features known to address specific user needs or business opportunities. Rather than testing if something might work, MBIs deliver functionality that's expected to perform based on earlier validation.

The feedback loop for MBIs centers on refinement rather than fundamental validation. You're measuring how well the increment delivers on expected value and identifying opportunities to enhance performance in subsequent releases.

‍

Role of Each in Reducing Development Risk

MVPs and MBIs both play critical roles in reducing development risk, but they address different types of uncertainty.

An MVP primarily reduces market risk by testing whether your product concept addresses a real need before you've invested substantially in building a complete solution. This helps you avoid the costly mistake of developing a product nobody wants. The early feedback lets you pivot quickly if necessary, potentially saving months of misdirected development effort.

MBIs focus more on execution risk by breaking complex development into manageable, value-delivering chunks. This approach ensures you're not building an entire system before realizing integration issues or scalability problems. If challenges arise, they affect only one increment rather than derailing an entire product launch.

‍

Stakeholder and Customer Engagement

The way you engage with stakeholders and customers differs significantly between MVP and MBI approaches, with each strategy offering unique benefits to different audiences.

An MVP primarily benefits internal stakeholders and early adopters who understand they're participating in something experimental. Product managers gain insights about market fit, developers learn which features truly matter, and business leaders get data to inform investment decisions. Early customers benefit from having input into the product's evolution but must accept a less polished experience in exchange for early access.

MBIs, by contrast, benefit a broader range of stakeholders with more immediate needs. Customers receive functional, production-ready features that deliver immediate value. Business stakeholders see regular returns on their investment through measurable metrics like improved conversion rates. Development teams benefit from the satisfaction of regularly shipping completed work rather than being stuck in extended cycles.

The most successful product teams often transition between these approaches based on the maturity of different product areas. New features might start as MVPs to validate concepts and then shift to an MBI approach once the core value is confirmed.

‍

Incremental Improvement and Long-Term Strategy

Successful product development rarely follows a single approach from start to finish. Understanding how to leverage both MVPs and MBIs as part of your long-term strategy can create a powerful framework for sustainable growth and innovation.

How MBIs Build Up a Product Systemically

MBIs create a structured path to product maturity through deliberate, value-focused increments. Each new feature or enhancement is designed to serve specific business objectives while fitting into the larger product vision.

This systematic approach ensures your product grows in a coherent, intentional way. Rather than adding features randomly, MBIs follow a strategic roadmap informed by business priorities and user needs.

The cumulative effect of well-designed MBIs is a product that feels cohesive despite being built in stages. Each increment reinforces your product's core value proposition and contributes to a unified user experience.

Using MVP Insights to Define MBIs

The insights gained from MVPs provide invaluable guidance for defining your MBIs. The feedback and data collected from early users help you prioritize which features to develop first and how to implement them most effectively.

When an MVP validates a particular direction, you can confidently invest in building more robust implementations through a series of MBIs. Conversely, when an MVP reveals that certain assumptions were incorrect, you can adjust your MBI roadmap to address the newly discovered needs.

This learning-driven approach ensures your development efforts remain aligned with actual market needs rather than internal assumptions.

Combining Both for Scalable Product Development

A mature product development strategy recognizes that MVPs and MBIs serve complementary purposes. By intentionally combining both approaches, you create a sustainable framework for innovation and growth.

You might use MVPs to explore new markets or feature categories while simultaneously delivering value through MBIs in your established product areas. This balanced approach allows you to maintain momentum with current customers while preparing for future expansion.

For larger organizations, different teams might employ different approaches depending on their focus. This division of responsibilities creates space for both exploration and execution, ensuring continued relevance in dynamic markets.

‍

Hire LowCode Agency to Build Your MVP

At LowCode Agency, we specialize in turning your product vision into reality using the most efficient development approaches. With over 330 successful applications built, we understand how to create MVPs that effectively validate your business concept while setting the foundation for future growth.

Our team brings deep expertise across multiple no-code and low-code platforms, allowing us to select the perfect technology for your specific needs. Whether your project is best suited for Bubble's powerful web application capabilities, FlutterFlow's cross-platform mobile development, or Glide's data-driven solutions, we have the specialized knowledge to deliver outstanding results.

Ready to bring your product idea to life? Book a free consultation call with our team to discuss your vision and learn how we can help you build an MVP that validates your concept and sets the stage for long-term success.